Nintendo vindicated in controller patent lawsuit

Guild Adept PDFs - Available exclusively @ Dungeon Masters Guild
Springs Hosting
Current D&D Campaign Adventures - Icewind Dale: Rime of the Frostmaiden
Springs Hosting
Old School RPGs - Available Now @ DriveThruRPG.com
DriveThruRPG.com
Create Your Own Eberron D&D Adventures @ Dungeon Masters Guild
Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis eBooks - Available Now @ DriveThruFiction.com

Speaking of Nintendo, the company was cleared today in federal appeals court of another company’s claims that its controllers violated its patents, reversing a jury’s findings of patent infringement and a $21 million judgment.

WaveBirdThe jury back in 2008 found that the WaveBird and standard controllers for the previous Nintendo console, the GameCube, as well as the Classic Controller for the Wii, infringed on Anasape’s patent for a wireless vibrating controller. Anascape also said the Wii Remote and Nunchuk controllers infringed on their design, but the jury did not agree.

Hit the jump for Nintendo’s full gloaty statement.

Federal Circuit Court Vindicates Nintendo in Patent Lawsuit

Court Overturns Verdict of East Texas Jury

REDMOND, Wash.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Today the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that none of Nintendo’s video game controllers infringe on a patent asserted by Anascape, Ltd.

Nintendo had been accused by Anascape, Ltd., of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,906,700. The case was tried before a jury in the Eastern District of Texas in May 2008. The jury found that neither the motion-sensing Wii Remote™ controller, nor the Nunchuk™ controller, infringes on the patent. However, the jury found that the Classic Controller™ for the Wii™ console, and the WaveBird™ and standard controllers for Nintendo GameCube™ did infringe on the patent. Today’s decision, however, completely reversed the jury’s findings of infringement.

“In 2008, the jury determined that the Wii Remote and Nunchuk did not infringe,” said Nintendo of America General Counsel Rick Flamm. “Today the Federal Circuit’s ruling confirmed that none of Nintendo’s controllers infringe. We appreciate that our position has been vindicated.”

For reference, the case is Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of America Inc. and the citation is 2008-1500.

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe for free updates!

Newsletters

View previous campaigns.

Powered by MailChimp

Nerdvana Media will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at news@nerdvanamedia.com. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

About the author

Avatar

Jayson Peters

Digital, social and print media pro. Nerdvana's founder, curator and editor.

Add Comment

Post a comment...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Samurai Comics