Springs Hosting

Splatoon: drawing a postmodern path for Nintendo


I’m not a shooter guy — and Splatoon is no shooter, at least not in the conventional sense.(To fall back on an earlier borrowed analogy, it’s to shooters what Super Mario Kart was to racing games — sort of.

Everything about Splatoon is unconventional. Hardcore gamergate-style bro gamers who fancy themselves digital warriors-in-waiting may decry it as juvenile or silly, but that usually stems from the assumption that a game of this kind, with people running around and trying to hit each other with things, needs to have R-rated hyper-realism and voice chat to be generally entertaining. Splatoon delivers the goods, if in a very different kind of package: As an “Inkling,” a species of squid that can morph at will into a young humanoid, you aren’t focused on shooting the enemy (although you can), but rather on covering as much of the battlefield as possible with your team’s shade of ink before the opposing side can do the same. It’s strategically demanding, and addicting.

Mechanics and tactics aside, even the marketing for Splatoon has been revolutionary, for today’s Nintendo anyway. (They’ve done some pretty clever and subversive things to advertise their games in the past, after all.) But that edgy strategy took a back seat to a tamer bandwagon approach that aimed at converting non-gamers into casual gamers back in the Wii days.

In the latest update ahead of this past weekend’s second “Splatfest” event (go team Roller Coaster, woo!), one of the new weapons was the N-ZAP ’89, a variation on the N-ZAP ’85, which itself was based on the Zapper light-gun accessory for the original Nintendo Entertainment System. The 1985 version of the Zapper was a “realistic” grey and white, while the 1989 re-issue added a bright neon orange to make it look less like a real gun.

Nintendo’s official Splatoon Tumblr blog, Live From Squid Research Lab, had fun with this bit of Eighties parental panic lore:


Continuing in this self-referential mode, a recent course description by the game’s “Inkopolis News” presenters Callie and Marie referenced both the original Pokemon GameBoy game (“super effective!”) and the Pokemon cartoon theme song (“the very best, like no one ever was!”). And never mind the names Callie and Marie — a riff on calamari that I didn’t even get until it dawned on me last week. It’s one of the little touches that show’s the thought that went into this game’s overall experience.

Via reddit
Via reddit

The biggest drawback to Splatoon in my house so far has been no any of these things, but something even more maddening and elemental than graphics or interteam communication challenges. It’s that my son and I can’t play the game’s core online “Turf War” mode together using the same Wii U — a result of the importance of the GamePad’s touchscreen to each individual player. I’m not sure this is something that will ever change, and the two-player Dojo’s balloon battles just don’t cut it; we want Turf War! The ink must flow …

It’s these Spatfests that show Nintendo is aware of an image problem and going to great lengths to do something about it, but not by just throwing stuff on the wall and seeing what sticks, and not by, well, not being Nintendo.

Much has been made of Nintendo’s recent struggles in the Console Wars and how it needs to “do better” and “keep up” with the PlayStations and Xboxes. But Nintendo hasn’t failed because it’s mission isn’t to outdo anyone or even to sell games — its mission is to make games, and it’s always done so in surprising and, yes, sometimes perplexing ways. The moment it stops doing that and starts doing what everyone else does just because that’s what they’re doing now — up to and including delivering broken games that doesn’t work, like others we could mention — that will be the moment Nintendo fails, and dies.

In the words of Callie and Marie: “Stay fresh!”

Subscribe for free updates!


View previous campaigns.

Powered by MailChimp

Nerdvana Media will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at news@nerdvanamedia.com. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

About the author


Jayson Peters

Founding curator of Nerdvana


Post a comment...
  • ” It’s that my son and I can’t play the game’s core online “Turf War” mode together using the same Wii U”

    YES YES YES! This and not having access to all the weapons in Battle Dojo

    • And not being able to pick what level you want to play on and no real local multiplayer and no Delphino Plaza stage… yet 😉

      • Yes, it can be frustrating sometimes that we can’t pick the stage, but for the most part I appreciate the curated feel, like we’re a guest and there’s a host choosing an experience for us. (Almost like a Dungeon Master.) Stay freeeesh!

        • Yeah, if thats how you like to play, more power to you. I don’t mind it as much, but it still does bother me. Especially since there is no reason now for the player to not be able to pick their own stage. There are plenty to pick form now. It just seems like a really short sighted idea, and honestly, I haven’t picked the game up since launch because of these few problems. It really shouldn’t be that big a deal, but again, there is absolutely no reason for anyone to not be allowed to pick what level they want. The concept of choosing the level you want to play in has been a staple of video games for decades.

  • I presume by “bro” the mean dudebros?

    I’ve never lived in the US but as I understand it they’re roughly analogous to chavs although less working class.

    What I really don’t get though is why media sources keep trying to suggest that the members of an international movement are part of an American subculture, its like they have no grasp of the concept that there is any other culture other than American.